Papagpafh and Arbitration
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Mediation, arbitration and negotiation
We compare three common dispute resolution processes — negotiation, mediation, and arbitration — in the framework of Crawford and Sobel (1982). Under negotiation, the two parties engage in (possibly arbitrarily long) face-to-face cheap talk. Under mediation, the parties communicate with a neutral third party who makes a non-binding recommendation. Under arbitration, the two parties commit to co...
متن کاملSynchronization and Arbitration in GALS
Synchronizers and arbiters are important components of any Globally Asynchronous, Locally Synchronous network. They contribute to latency, because of the synchronization time required for reliability, and to metastability delay in the arbiters. Simple models of metastability have served us well up to now, but more recently work on the characterisation of deep metastability has demonstrated effe...
متن کاملMediation, Arbitration and Negotiation By
We compare three common dispute resolution processes – negotiation, mediation, and arbitration – in the framework of Crawford and Sobel [V. Crawford, J. Sobel, Strategic information transmission, Econometrica 50 (6) (1982) 1431–1451]. Under negotiation, the two parties engage in (possibly arbitrarily long) face-to-face cheap talk. Under mediation, the parties communicate with a neutral third pa...
متن کاملMedical Malpractice Arbitration Act: Michigan's experience with arbitration.
In the 1970's, Michigan and other states were confronted with a medical malpractice crisis of astronomical proportions. The escalating number of medical malpractice lawsuits and concomitant increase in malpractice premiums for health care providers fostered a divisive climate among doctors, lawyers and patients. In response to this crisis, the Michigan legislature enacted the Medical Malpractic...
متن کاملYour First International Arbitration: Do’s and Don’ts What’s Wrong with Arbitration?
When it comes to fairness in modern U.S. insurance and reinsurance arbitrations (hereafter “insurance arbitrations”), perception is arguably as important as reality. If the parties do not perceive the process to be fair, they will not embrace arbitration as an alternative to litigation regardless of whether it is cheaper or faster. Central to the parties’ perception of fairness is the compositi...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Classical Philology
سال: 1919
ISSN: 0009-837X,1546-072X
DOI: 10.1086/360203